To my reader,
I appreciate all of your support and time spent reading my articles over the years. I wanted to give you the opportunity to submit articles, videos, or books for me to address. Fire away!
Taylor
User Submission Time!
Skip to content
The Young, Textless, and Reformed
Defending the historic view of the Holy Scriptures
The Young, Textless, and Reformed 
Could you address John MacArthurs book Systematic Theology book titled “Biblical Doctrine”? Particularly, his view of text and canon.
LikeLike
Could you address John MacArthurs Systematic theology book titled “Biblical Doctrine”? Particularly, his view of text and canon.
LikeLike
Let me get my hands on a copy and I’ll take a look! Thanks for the suggestion
LikeLike
Hey, brother Taylor. Glad to see you have been making some posts lately. Hope to see you back on YouTube soon! I believe I made this recommendation awhile back either on here or YouTube or Patreon. I think it would be good to review Arthur Pink’s comments on the PA in his commentary on John. He wasn’t a “TR Guy”, but accepted the PA for various reasons, and I believe his comments show a stark contrast in how “believing” textual scholars have devolved over the generations.
LikeLike
I have something started for this – thanks for the suggestion!
LikeLike
There is a claim on Timothy Berg’s website kjbhistory.com that Erasmus accidentally omitted the word God in Revelation 1:8 and it wasn’t corrected until the 19th century.
I see several problems right off the bat with this for one the word Lord is synonymous for God in the context anyway. Second if wasn’t corrected until the 19th century that would mean Erasmus himself never acknowledged such a thing nor did Stephanus or Beza. I’m not sure where he got this from? I haven’t seen anyone make this claim before. Not one commentator before the 19th Century at least. This theory seems to coincide with the publication of the RV which added the word God after Lord while omitting the clause “the beginning and the ending” I don’t know if Berg made it up for himself borrowed this theory for himself contemporary scholar or discovered it the works of someone like Scrivener or Hort? In any event I don’t believe it. Sounds like another conjectured textual theory they can’t prove. His website is full of misinformation about the KJB and the received text, but this one Revelation is the particular one that caught my eye.
LikeLike
Hi brother, I would love to talk with you about your articles and maybe an interview for my website. If you can drop me a line at larues2chile@gmail.com I would greatly appreciate it.
LikeLike
Hi Taylor, Hope you are well.
Maybe you could critique this article by Krans if you haven’t already? Thx
https://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2020/10/why-textus-receptus-cannot-be-accepted.html?m=1
LikeLike
Hi Taylor, I wonder if you could discuss the Macro Micro distinction of Theodore Letis? Thx.
LikeLike
I can put something together for that
LikeLike
This YouTube by Letis is rather interesting on Burgon and the monumental work he did.
LikeLike